首页> 外文OA文献 >Something Old, Something New?: Re-Theorizing Patriarchal Relations and Privatization from the Outskirts of Family Law
【2h】

Something Old, Something New?: Re-Theorizing Patriarchal Relations and Privatization from the Outskirts of Family Law

机译:是旧的还是新的?:重新建立父权制关系的理论,并从家庭法的郊区私有化

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Canada has an enviable record of relatively progressive and egalitarian legislation and policy in relation to Canadian family forms. The country’s constitutional guarantees of equality and multiculturalism provide the legal foundation for this record. In particular, Canada\u27s leadership in the recognition of and support for same-sex relationships in family law and social policy is widely acknowledged. This is, however, also deeply contested terrain: Feminist legal scholars informed by critical political economy argue that recent family law advances in Canada sit compatibly with neo-liberal social policy and restructuring of the welfare state; the neo-conservative and religious right assert that the fundamental nature of family has been undermined by the recognition of same-sex marriage, facilitating the legal recognition of polygamous relationships, among others. Still others take the view that despite a liberal, progressive and formally egalitarian approach to family, the legal recognition of same-sex marriage in Canada reflects and reinforces a historically patriarchal heterosexual institution that should be jettisoned rather than embraced. These arguments raise issues and illustrate more generally the tensions in state and legal construction and regulation of familial relations - historically and in the current context. In this Article, I re-theorize the significance of patriarchy and the relationship between patriarchal relations and the discourse of privatization in critical family law. Using the experience of women from the \u22outskirts\u22 - lesbian spouses, welfare mothers, and women in polygamous relationships - I demonstrate the limits of any theory of \u22privatization\u22 that does not theorize patriarchal relations. In particular, I identify and analyze the impediments to equality posed by increasingly invisible, but no less enduring, patriarchal familial ideologies in order to envision forms of family law reform and state social policy that might actually improve gendered and generational familial relations and transform the social landscape more generally.
机译:加拿大在与加拿大家庭形式有关的相对进步和平等的立法和政策方面有着令人羡慕的记录。该国对平等和多元文化的宪法保障为这一纪录提供了法律基础。特别是,加拿大在承认和支持家庭法和社会政策中的同性关系方面发挥了领导作用。然而,这也是一个充满争议的领域:从批判性政治经济学中获悉的女权法律学者认为,加拿大最近家庭法的发展与新自由主义社会政策和福利国家的重组相适应。新保守主义和宗教权利主张,承认同性婚姻破坏了家庭的基本性质,这促进了一夫多妻制关系的法律承认。还有一些人认为,尽管对家庭采取自由,渐进和正式的平等主义态度,但加拿大对同性婚姻的法律承认反映并加强了一个历史悠久的重男轻女异性婚姻制度,应予以抛弃而不是予以接受。这些争论提出了问题,并更广泛地说明了历史和当前背景下的国家和法律建设以及对家庭关系的调节的紧张关系。在本文中,我重新阐述了父权制的重要性以及父权制关系与批判性家庭法中私有化话语之间的关系。利用来自郊区的妇女的经验-女同性恋配偶,福利母亲和处于一夫多妻制关系中的妇女-我证明了没有对父权关系进行理论化的任何“私有化”理论的局限性。特别是,我确定并分析了越来越无形但持续不衰的父权制家庭意识形态所带来的平等障碍,以期设想形式的家庭法改革和国家社会政策,这些形式可能实际上改善性别和世代家庭关系并改变社会风景一般。

著录项

  • 作者

    Gavigan, Shelley A. M.;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2012
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号